Clawback Clause for Startup Stock - Can I Keep What I think I Own?
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Updated October 19, 2020 for a recent clawback event in the news.
Everyone loves a gold rush story about startup hires making millions on startup equity. But not all startup equity is created equal. If a startup adds a repurchase rights for vested shares (a.k.a. a clawback clause or clawback provision) to its agreements, individuals may lose the value of their vested equity because a company can force them to sell their shares back to the company in certain situations, such as if they leave their jobs or are fired prior to IPO or acquisition. Other examples of a clawback clause are forfeiture (rather than repurchase) of vested shares or options at termination of employment or for violation of IP agreements or non-competes.
Image from Babak Nivi of Venture Hacks, who warns startup founders and hires to “run screaming from” startup offers with a clawback clause for vested shares: “Founders and employees should not agree to this provision under any circumstances. Read your option plan carefully.”
How a Clawback Clause Limits Startup Equity Value
In a true startup equity plan, executives and employees earn shares, which they continue to own when they leave the company. There are special rules about vesting and requirements for exercising options, but once the shares are earned (and options exercised), these stockholders have true ownership rights.
But for startups with a clawback clause, individuals earn shares they don’t really own. In the case of repurchase rights for vested shares, the company can purchase the shares upon certain events, most commonly after the individual leaves or is terminated by the company. If the individual is still at the company at the time of an IPO or acquisition, they get the full value of the shares. If not, the company can buy back the shares at a discounted price, called the “fair market value” of the common stock (“FMV”) on the date of termination of employment or other triggering event.
Most hires do not know about the clawback clause when they negotiate an offer, join a company or exercise their stock options. This means they are earning equity and purchasing shares but do not have a true sense of its value or their ownership rights (or lack thereof).
Clawback Clause “Horrible” for Employees - Sam Altman of Y Combinator
In some cases a stockholder would be happy to sell their shares back to the company. But repurchase rights are not designed with the individual’s interests in mind. They allow the company to buy the shares back against the stockholder’s will and at a discounted price per share known as the “fair market value” or “FMV” of the common stock. As Sam Altman (now CEO of OpenAI) wrote when he was the head of Y Combinator, “It’s fine if the company wants to offer to repurchase the shares, but it’s horrible for the company to be able to demand this.”
The FMV paid by the company for the shares is not the true value for two reasons. First, the true value of common stock is close to the preferred stock price per share (the price that is paid by investors for stock and which is used to define the valuation of the startup), but the buyback FMV is far lower than this valuation. Second, the real value of owning startup stock comes at the exit event - IPO or acquisition. This early buyback prevents the stockholder realizing that growth or “pop” in value.
What is an Example of a Clawback Clause?
Famous Example - Skype Shares Worth $0 in $8.5 Billion Acquisition by Microsoft
In 2011, when Microsoft bought Skype for $8.5 billion (that’s a B), some former employees and executives were outraged when they found that their equity was worth $0 because of a clawback in their equity documents. Their shock followed a period of disbelief, during which they insisted that they owned the shares. They couldn’t lose something they owned, right?
One former employee who received $0 in the acquisition said that while the fine print of the legal documents did set forth this company right, he was not aware of it when he joined. “I would have never gone to work there had I known,” he told Bloomberg. According to Bloomberg, “The only mention that the company had the right to buy if he left in less than five years came in a single sentence toward the end of the document that referred him to yet another document, which he never bothered to read.”
Both Skype and the investors who implemented the clawbacks, Silver Lake Partners, were called out in the press as “evil,” the startup community’s indignation did not change the legal status of the employees and executives who were cut out of millions of dollars of value in the deal.
Recent Example - Tanium, funded by Salesforce Ventures and Andreessen Horowitz, claws back employee shares
More recently, Business Insider reported that Tanium, funded by Salesforce Ventures and Andreessen Horowitz, has forced employees to sell their shares back to the company at FMV after their employment is terminated.
The employees interviewed by Business Insider were not aware of that their contract included this clawback when they accepted their offers. “'Surprised' was my initial reaction," one such employee said. "I had not heard of that happening before. To me it felt like a gut punch. One of the reasons for working for the company is dangling the carrot of eventually going public or eventually getting acquired so employees would monetarily benefit from that.”
How Does a Clawback Provision Work?
Hypothetical Example #1 - Company Does NOT Have Clawback Clause for Vested Shares - Share Value: $1.7 Million
Here’s an example of how an individual would earn the value of startup stock without repurchase rights or clawbacks. In the case of an early hire of Ruckus Wireless, Inc., the value would have grown as shown below.
This is an example of a hypothetical early hire of Ruckus Wireless, which went public in 2012. It assumes that the company did not restrict executive or employee equity with repurchase rights or other clawbacks for vested shares. This person would have had the right to hold the shares until IPO and earn $1.7 million.
This is an example of a hypothetical early hire of Ruckus Wireless, which went public in 2012. It assumes that the company did not restrict executive or employee equity with repurchase rights or other clawbacks for vested shares. This person would have had the right to hold the shares until IPO and earn $1.7 million. If you want to see the working calculations, see this Google Sheet.
These calculations were estimated from company public filings with the State of California, the State of Delaware, and the Securities and Exchange Commission. For more on these calculations, see The One Percent: How 1% of Ruckus Wireless at Series A Became $1.7 million at IPO.
Hypothetical Example #2 - Company Has Clawback Clause for Vested Shares - Share Value: $68,916
If the company had the right to repurchase the shares at FMV at the individual’s departure, and they left after four years of service when the shares were fully vested, the forced buyout price would have been $68,916 (estimated). This would have caused the stockholder to forfeit $1,635,054 in value.
In this hypothetical, the individual would have lost $1,635,054 in value if the shares were repurchased at their termination. If you want to see the working calculations, see this Google Sheet.
No Surprises - Identifying a Clawback Clause During Negotiation
As you can see, clawbacks dramatically affect the value of startup stock. For some clients, this term is a deal breaker when they are negotiating a startup offer. For others, it makes cash compensation more important in their negotiation. Either way, it’s essential to know about this term when evaluating and negotiating an offer, or in considering the value of equity after joining a startup.
Unfortunately this term is not likely to be spelled out in an offer letter. It can appear in any number of documents such as stock option agreements, stockholders agreements, bylaws, IP agreements or non-compete agreements. These are not usually offered to a recruit before they sign the offer letter and joining the company. But they can be requested and reviewed during the negotiation stage to discover and renegotiate clawbacks and other red-flag terms.
What is a Typical Clawback Clause?
For examples of typical clawback clause language, see Part 2 - Examples of Clawbacks for Startup Stock.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Early Exercise of Startup Stock Options
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Planning for your startup stock options? Consider an early exercise of stock options to protect your equity stake from taxes and forfeiture.
Most people learn the hard way about the complexity of exercising stock options at a startup. If you can spare a few minutes of attention, this post will teach you about early exercise - the easy street of startup stock option exercise strategies.
Early Exercise Stock Options
An “early exercise” is an exercise of unvested stock options. You pay the exercise price to the company and file an 83(b) election with the IRS before the options vest.
Early exercise makes you the owner of the shares in the eyes of the company. The shares are still subject to the options’ original vesting schedule, though, as the unvested shares can be repurchased from you if you leave the company prior to your vesting milestones. The repurchase price for unvested shares is usually the lower of your exercise price or the fair market value (“FMV”) on the date of termination.
Early exercise with an 83(b) election also makes you the owner of the shares in the eyes of the IRS. That means you start your capital gains and, perhaps, Qualified Small Business Stock (“QSBS”) holding periods, which sets you up for the lowest possible tax rates when you sell your shares.
Tax Benefits of Early Exercise of Stock Options
If you early exercise while your exercise price is equal to the FMV of the common shares, the exercise itself is not taxable and therefore defers all taxation until you sell the shares and have cash gains to use to pay the taxes.
This may seem like overkill on planning, but the tax bill for a later option exercise can snowball surprisingly quickly and make it impossible to exercise vested stock options. More on this here: Startup Stock Options - Early Expiration - The $1M Problem. Early exercise can, therefore, act as a forfeiture-avoidance strategy as it can defer taxes until sale of stock and, therefore, save people from prohibitive pre-liquidity tax bills for exercise.
When to Early Exercise Stock Options
Since options are granted with an exercise price equal to the FMV on the date of grant, it’s a safe bet to early exercise immediately after grant to be sure you can do so without a tax cost.
The most common approach is to negotiate for the right to early exercise in the grant at the offer letter stage, and then join the company and wait a while before early exercising. This allows employees to get some visibility on the company’s possibility of success and their own fit within the company. So long as the early exercise is completed while the FMV is still equal to the strike price, the early exercise is tax free.
If you early exercise (or exercise vested options) after the FMV has increased above the exercise price (such as after a round of funding following your grant date) you will have taxable income on the difference between the FMV and the exercise price in the year of exercise. (The tax rates depend on whether you are early exercising NQSO or making an qualifying early exercise of ISOs.) This might seem unappealing, as you would of course prefer to defer all taxes until sale of stock. However, some people choose to early exercise even if they have to recognize income on that early exercise in order to be taxed at exercise on the current FMV rather than paying higher taxes on a later exercise based on a higher FMV.
Investment Risk of Early Exercise Options
The downside of early exercising startup stock options is investment risk, as you have to pay the exercise price (and, perhaps, some taxes at exercise) out of pocket before you have any visibility into whether the value of the shares will go up in the future. That’s why early exercise is very common and an easy choice at early stage companies where the FMV and, therefore, the exercise price is low. For instance, a first employee might be able to exercise 1% of the company for, say, $5,000. It’s a less obvious choice when the company is at a later stage and the exercise price of stock options is significant. For instance, some startup stock options packages have a $1M+ exercise price.
Some key hires of later stage startups with higher option exercise prices negotiate for the right to early exercise (or exercise vested options) with a promissory note instead of cash. Instead of paying their significant exercise price with cash, they deliver a promissory note to the company. This is a promise to pay the exercise price at some date in the future. There is some complexity to this to address with your advisor if you are considering this path.
Negotiating the Right to Early Exercise Options
Early exercise is not available at every company. Therefore, if you want to early exercise you will need to negotiate for this right during your offer letter negotiation or after you join the company.
For example, some early Uber employees negotiated to add the right to early exercise to their existing stock option grants. This allowed them to early exercise their unvested options (and exercise their vested options) before the FMV of the shares skyrocketed, so that the tax bill for the exercise was only in the tens of thousands of dollars.
Despite the out-of-pocket cost for the exercise price and taxes, this was a wise exercise choice for a few reasons. First, if they had waited and exercised after the FMV skyrocketed they would have had to pay far more in taxes to exercise - in some cases more than $1M. More on that issue here. Second, if they had failed to early exercise and ended up leaving the company prior to the company’s IPO, they would have had to come up with those astronomical tax payments before they had a market to sell the stock. This is because the company had only a 30-day post-termination exercise deadline and an absolute prohibition on sales of stock prior to IPO. Third, many of these employees purchased their shares while the company was QSBS eligible and then held the shares for the 5-year QSBS holding period. This qualified them for 0% federal tax rates on up to $10M in gains on the sale of their shares.
ISOs v. NSOs and Early Exercise Stock Options
If you are early exercising stock options, it is more favorable to have the options granted as NQSO rather than ISOs. If you early exercise ISOs, you have to hold the shares for two years before sale for long-term capital gains tax rates on your gains. If you early exercise NSOs, you only have to hold the shares for one year for capital gains treatment. Therefore, if you are planning to early exercise immediately after the grant, you will want to ask the company to make the grant as a NQSO rather than an ISO.
If you are not planning to early exercise, you may not want to include the right to early exercise in your documents. That’s because of the $100K limitation on ISOs. ISOs are a tax-favored stock option that are subject to certain limits under the tax code. Only $100K in exercise price of stock options can become exercisable in any given year and qualify as ISOs. So if you have a $400K exercise price grant that is intended to be ISOs, all $400K of the options will be ISOs if you do not include the right to early exercise. If you do include the right to early exercise, all $400K will become exercisable in the first year and so only $100K of the options will be ISOs. The remainder will be NSOs which are less tax favored.
Don’t Forget the Section 83(b) Election
If you early exercise unvested stock options, you file a Section 83(b) election with the IRS within 30 days of the exercise. The consequences of a missed 83(b) election can be very, very unappealing. If you don’t have the attention necessary to follow through on that, don’t early exercise.
When to Exercise Stock Options
As you can see, early exercise of stock options is not the best choice in every situation. To learn about the best structures for a variety of cases, see Examples of Good Startup Equity Design by Company Stage. For a comprehensive analysis of when to exercise stock options, see this three-part series:
Part 2: The Menu of Startup Stock Option Exercise Strategies
Part 3: FAQ on the Menu of Startup Stock Option Exercise Strategies
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Proposed in the U.S. Senate - Changes to Startup Employee Equity Taxation - CEO and Worker Pension Fairness Act
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
If national politics take a strange turn and an unlikely new tax bill proposed in the U.S. Senate last month becomes law, individuals can expect a huge tax hit on NQSOs and startup RSUs. NQSOs would become taxable at vesting on the spread between the exercise price and the FMV. Currently, the exercise - rather than the vesting - of a NQSO is the taxable event. RSUs would become taxable at their FMV when time-based service milestones are achieved. Currently, taxation on RSUs in specially-designed private company plans (such as Airbnb and Pinterest) is deferred until an IPO or company acquisition.
There is an exception in the bill for those grants that qualify for Section 83(i) - which was intended to allow for deferral of taxation on private company stock until it becomes tradeable. But Section 83(i) as enacted is very limited and not workable in practice. Therefore, startup employees can expect that their NQSOs and RSUs - as they are currently designed - would be taxable even if they are not able to sell the shares to cover the tax bill.
So what will happen in practice? Startup employees with valuable equity grants would either pay high taxes out of their own savings (if they have them) before their shares are tradable or walk away from valuable equity opportunities to avoid this tax expense.
This would also change the world of equity compensation design, as tax is the underlying rhythm of all employee equity. The best practices as of today would become obsolete. In practice, I predict that this bill would result in an unexpected and very anti-employee consequence in future equity compensation design: more company clawbacks on time-vested shares.
More clawbacks? The same clawbacks that experts have called “horrible for employees” and encouraged people to “run screaming from” in a job offer? Yes. A clawback is the right of a company to take back time-vested shares if an employee leaves the company prior to an acquisition or IPO. This term dramatically reduces the value of startup equity, as most individuals who work at startups in the early stages do not stay at those startups all the way until the acquisition or IPO.
Why would more clawbacks be the result of this proposed bill? If companies design their NQSOs and RSUs so that employees are required to remain in service until the later of the date of an acquisition/IPO or their time-based vesting schedule, those employees would not be taxed under this new bill when they meet their time-based vesting requirements. In that workaround, though, employees would forfeit their time-vested shares if they leave the company prior to the acquisition or IPO. That means that employees would have to stay in service until that exit event to have a payout and, therefore, that far fewer early stage employees would have paydays in startup acquisitions and IPOs.
It would be hard to believe that these are the results intended by the bill, but from my perspective this is the most likely outcome for employee equity grants. Thoughts?
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
The Increasing Burden on Startups to Convince Good Candidates to Join - Q4 Newsletter - Stock Option Counsel, P.C.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Happy New Year, Startup Community!
Here's our latest update from the world of startup equity on a new service from Stock Option Counsel and excerpts from a fascinating discussion at Hacker News on the increasing burden on startups to convince good candidates to join.
Tell Your Boss. We now offer on-site programs at later-stage startups to help employees and executives plan for future liquidity. Our CPA and financial planning partners present in groups or individual power sessions. This is a huge help to startup HR and finance executives who are restricted from providing individual advice to their employees and executives. Let them know this service is available so they can offer it as a benefit to you!
Startups' Increasing Burden in Hiring Top Talent. We counsel individuals on negotiating their startup job offers. We see on a daily basis that startups have to make meaningful and well-designed equity offers to recruit talent from big tech. Here's some excerpts from a fascinating conversation on this topic at Hacker News:
Waving a fraction of a percent in equity in front of candidates simply does not work anymore. … Coming into 2020, I think startups’ best bet is to [be] transparent and honest with candidates about all risks involved when joining a startup and factoring all this into the amount of equity they offer which should be something considerable. - Zain Amro, a software engineer based in Berkeley, California, from his blog
I believe [Zain's] post does a very good job of bringing the elephant in the room into the discussion. The current structure of equity compensation for early-stage startup companies is simply not enticing enough to get people to choose that over the salary and predictable path of BigTechCos. ... We should ... give more equity to early employees and have favorable terms around vesting for these employees and better timing around the loss of options after leaving a company. … Ensuring your early employees will be taken care of means they'll work harder for your company and this will increase the chance you'll survive long enough to see an event that makes anyone a return on their investment. - Grimm1 at Hacker News
This is easy. Offer relatively competitive TC with a real potential upside to the equity package and a work environment that's attractive. BigCorp is mired in politics and decision-making that's grounded in risk mitigation. Do something legitimately interesting and folks will come. Give them some agency and the ability to really get things done and they'll stay. - halbritt at Hacker News
What’s a more democratic funding model to spread net innovation? - bhl at Hacker News
There are already 372 comments in the discussion. I hope it grows in 2020!
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. - Legal Services for Individuals. Thank you for all your enthusiasm for my practice and for the Stock Option Counsel Blog. It's been another great year. I will continue to send quarterly updates on important topics in the market for startup equity for individual founders, executives and employees. Please keep in touch and have a very happy 2020!
Best,
Mary
Mary Russell | Attorney and Founder
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. | Legal Services for Individuals
(650) 326-3412 | mary@stockoptioncounsel.com
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Silicon Valley Wins Big With Tax Break Aimed at Small Businesses: An eight-figure IPO windfall can mean a zero-digit tax bill
"If you planned well, you ended up with a phenomenal result," says Mary Russell, an attorney at Stock Option Counsel in Palo Alto, Calif., who advises tech employees on their compensation. "If you didn’t, you were in a really tight, messy spot." Photo by Mikhail Nilov.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Startup equity and Stock Option Counsel, P.C. in Bloomberg Business this week:
“While venture investors and founders, who can afford top-notch tax advice, are using [the Qualified Small Business Stock tax provision to take advantage of 0% tax rates on startup gains], tech workers might not be as lucky. The rules are complicated, and it can be easy to miss out. For example, early employees needed to have exercised options at a time when their startup was still under $50 million in assets. ‘If you planned well, you ended up with a phenomenal result,’ says Mary Russell, an attorney at Stock Option Counsel in Palo Alto, Calif., who advises tech employees on their compensation. ‘If you didn’t, you were in a really tight, messy spot.’”
For more information about planning for option exercises, see The Menu of Stock Option Exercise Strategies. Happy strategizing!
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Uber IPO - Lessons for Negotiating Startup Equity Offers - Spring 2019 Newsletter - Stock Option Counsel, P.C. - Legal Services for Individuals
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Hello Startup Community!
Uber's IPO is a great lesson for startup employees on negotiating their startup equity. Unicorn startup recruiters have been telling hires for the past few years to value the offered RSUs at many multiples, even 10X, of the most recent investor valuation in negotiating their compensation offers. Since Uber's value has not risen even 2X in that time, any hires who accepted offers based on this calculus have lost significant value compared to their opportunity cost.
Individuals need negotiate for enough shares in a startup to balance their risk. The calculation for the right number of RSUs at a late-stage startup with a public-company-size valuation is the current investor value per share, not the potentialfuture value.
Shira Ovide explored this issue in Bloomberg Opinion last week with input from Stock Option Counsel:
Uber's example shows that employees at startups – particularly those who come aboard when the company is more mature – often don't get rich, even when the companies are successful. Many workers are at the bottom rung of stock holders and tend to have less information about their company's value and prospects than just about anyone else who holds shares. ... Mary Russell of Stock Option Counsel, which advises employees on compensation at startups, said people evaluating job offers at more mature startups should analyze only what the proposed equity is worth at the time of negotiation, not what it could possibly be worth in a dreamy future. That’s not always easy, because Russell said startup recruiters sometimes suggest that a 10-fold increase in valuation in the past is an indication of what prospective employees can expect from their wealth.
For more on using current value to evaluate startup equity offers, see this video from the Stock Option Counsel blog.
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. - Legal Services for Individuals. Thank you for your enthusiasm for my practice and for the Stock Option Counsel Blog! I will continue to send quarterly updates on important topics in the market for startup equity for individual founders, executives and employees. Please keep in touch.
Best,
Mary
Mary Russell | Attorney and Founder
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. | Legal Services for Individuals
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Seed Stage Startup Job Offer - Equity Negotiation Checklist
Working for a Startup? Seed Stage Startup Job Offer Equity Compensation Negotiation Checklist. Image from rawpixel.com.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Have a job offer from a seed stage startup? Individuals work for equity at seed stage startups (otherwise known as early stage startups) with the expectation that they will have great financial success if the company itself is successful. That dream can come true, but it depends on taking care of a few key details of the option or restricted stock at the offer negotiation stage. Here’s the Stock Option Counsel negotiation checklist for seed stage startup offer negotiations.
Percentage Ownership. The lore of Silicon Valley is that anyone who joins an early stage startup that is later a huge success will become rich. But if they fail to negotiate a significant number of shares at hire, they cannot expect that the value of their interest at the time of an acquisition or IPO will be impressive. Since being one of the first startup employees is extremely risky, there needs to be enough equity in the offer to balance that risk. I have seen individuals who are disappointed (to say the least) in these situations when they have accepted a below-market equity percentage and assumed that the founders would “take care of them” in the future. With these points in mind, I recommend taking the following steps before agreeing to join a startup:
Negotiate for enough shares up-front to balance the risk in joining the company. This is based on market norms, so do plenty of research among colleagues and advisors to confidently set market-based expectations.
Insist on time-based, not performance or milestone, vesting.
Expect that the equity interest will be significantly diluted and negotiate for enough shares to cover that expectation.
Making it Official. At the earliest stage startups, employees and founders often work for promises of future equity without signing the necessary paperwork to ensure that they have the legal right to that equity. They often start working with vague promises of future grants and “trust” that their business partners will “take care of them” in the future. This is misguided, as the purpose of a stock option grant or any written agreement is to not have to rely solely on the trust you have in any individual person. Since changes in leadership, investors, direction, etc. are guaranteed to happen at some point in time, you need protection from the company not promises from the current leaders. Before signing an Offer Letter or beginning work, I suggest to first:
Ask for a copy of the Form of Stock Option Grant or Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, along with any other documents referenced therein. Review the terms and negotiate any issues.
Ask the company to confirm that the board will officially make the equity grant promptly after hire.
Board Approval Timing. Early stage startup companies often delay officially making grants to the detriment of their employees. This is due to administrative disorganization, a desire to delay the legal and valuation expenses of making the grant, or even a disagreement among executives and investors about how much equity should be allocated for employee grants. After starting in the role, take the following steps:
Follow up to be sure the grant is made by the board promptly. This should not take more than a couple of months.
Compare the terms of the grant to be sure they are as-agreed during the offer negotiation stage.
Tax Planning. The potential tax benefits to receiving equity in an early stage startup are unparallelled. The structure may allow for tax deferral until sale of stock - which avoids the problem of paying taxes on option exercise before liquidity - and lower capital gains tax rates or even 0% QSBS tax rates on gains. Achieving these tax benefits requires precise design by the company - such as restricted stock or early exercised stock options - and effective execution by the individual - such as the timely delivery of the purchase price and filing of the Section 83(b) election with the IRS. Early tax planning action items are:
Negotiate the tax structure during the offer negotiation stage. The right structure will depend on the stage of the company, so work with advisors if necessary to determine the most desirable structure for your grant.
Take care of the required follow-through to take advantage of the most desirable tax structures.
Legal Terms. Startup employees are sometimes very surprised by the legal terms in their grant years after they have accepted its terms. They might have assumed that they have the right to hold the shares that they have purchased and vested and find out that the company can forcibly repurchase the shares at their termination. Or they might assume that they have the right to earn their unvested shares following an acquisition but find out that they can be cancelled as part of the deal without payment. To avoid these and other unpleasant surprises regarding the legal terms of a grant, take the following steps during negotiation:
Ask for a copy of the Form of Stock Option Grant or Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, along with any other documents referenced therein.
Review the terms and negotiate any issues before committing to joining.
If the legal terms have unexpected risks, negotiate for more shares or more cash compensation to balance the risk.
Have an offer from a seed stage startup? Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Winter 2019 Newsletter - Stock Option Counsel® - Startup Offer Letter? The Equity Issues Hidden Between the Lines
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Hello Startup Community!
If you have an Offer Letter from a startup, you may notice that it’s light on information about stock options or other equity. See this new post on the Stock Option Counsel Blog to learn the key issues hidden between the lines. It covers:
Grant Timing. The exercise price is not negotiable, but you will want to follow up after your start date to be sure that the board grants the options promptly. Delays are common and can increase the exercise price dramatically and reduce the value of your stock options.
Protection for Unvested Shares. The standard vesting schedule will not protect unvested shares in an acquisition. Consider negotiating for double trigger acceleration upon change of control.
Clawbacks and Other Red Flags. The equity incentive plan and stock option agreement are usually not provided with the Offer Letter. However, it makes sense to request and review those documents before signing the Offer Letter to identify clawbacks for vested shares or any other red flag terms
Tax Structure. The right tax structure will balance your interests in total value, low tax rates, tax deferral, limited tax risks and investment deferral.
You can see the full post on the Stock Option Counsel Blog, along with other great information on startup equity negotiations. Happy reading.
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. - Legal Services for Individuals. Thank you for your enthusiasm for my practice and for the Stock Option Counsel Blog! I will continue to send quarterly updates on important topics in the market for startup equity for individual founders, executives and employees. Please keep in touch.
Best,
Mary
Mary Russell | Attorney and Founder
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. | Legal Services for Individuals
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Have an Offer Letter from a Startup? The Equity Issues are Between the Lines
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Working for a startup? Learn more about the fine print terms of an offer letter. Plan ahead to protect your equity stake.
If you have an Offer Letter from a startup, you may notice that it’s light on information about stock options. You may see a few sentences noting that (1) the company will recommend to the board that the grant be made at the first market value on the date of grant; (2) the option will vest monthly over four years with a one-year cliff; and (3) the option will be governed by the company’s equity incentive plan and your stock option agreement. It sounds simple. But the key issues are hidden between the lines.
Change of Control Protections for Unvested Shares
A standard vesting schedule does not provide protection for unvested shares in the event the company is acquired. If you are joining in a senior position or as an early stage employee, consider negotiating for a double trigger acceleration upon change of control to protect the right to earn unvested shares. The most robust double trigger language would provide that 100% of unvested shares will accelerate if you are terminated or constructively terminated as part of or at any time following a change of control. See this blog post for more information on change of control terms for startup equity offers.
Clawbacks for Vested Shares
The equity incentive plan and stock option agreement are usually not provided with the Offer Letter unless requested, as the official equity grant is not made until after the start date. However, these agreements contain important details about the grant, so it makes sense to review them before agreeing to the number of shares or signing the Offer Letter.
For example, the equity incentive plan and stock option agreement may give the company the right to forcibly repurchase shares from the employee after termination of employment, even if they are vested shares of restricted stock or vested shares issued upon exercise of options. See this post for some examples of how those clawbacks may be drafted. Clawbacks dramatically limit the value of the equity, as the most significant increase in the value of startups has historically been at the time of an exit event. If this term, or any other red flag term, appears in the form documents, it makes sense to negotiate these out of the deal or provide for alternative compensation to make up for the potential loss in value before signing the Offer Letter.
Tax Structure
The Offer Letter may not include the terms of the tax structure, but if you have any leverage on those terms the Offer Letter negotiation is the time to address them. The right tax structure will balance your interests in total value, low tax rates, tax deferral, limited tax risks and investment deferral. This balance is different at each company stage. For example, at the earliest stage startups you may be able to meet all those goals with the purchase of Restricted Stock for a de minimis purchase price. At mid-stage startups you might prefer to have Incentive Stock Options with an extended post-termination exercise period to defer the investment until a liquidity event. At late-stage startups you might prefer Restricted Stock Units for a full value grant. See this blog post on Examples of Good Startup Equity Design by Company Stage and this blog post on The Menu of Stock Option Exercise Strategies.
Grant Timing
The company will set the exercise price at the fair market value ("FMV") on the date the board grants the options to you. This price is not negotiable, but to protect your interests you want to follow up after your start date to be sure that the board makes the grant of the options soon after your start date. If they delay granting you the options until after a financing or other important event, the FMV and the exercise price will go up. This would reduce the value of your stock options by the increase in value of the company’s common stock during that time.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Fall 2018 Newsletter - Stock Option Counsel®
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Hello Startup Community!
Here's the big news in the world of startup equity.
Leaked Compensation Data for Startup Executives from Andreessen Horowitz. Business Insider has published a database of startup executive compensation data leaked from Andreessen Horowitz. It was sourced from executive search firms and is searchable by fundraising stage. This data may be valuable to startup executives negotiating their compensation and interesting to anyone curious to know how much executives in the startup world earn in cash and equity.
How to Use the Data. The data reveals that the level defined for a role can dramatically affect the compensation offer. For example, the difference between the compensation for a CMO and a VP of Marketing at a Series A company would be significant in both cash and equity. In counseling individuals on their compensation negotiations, I see the most significant increases in cash and equity from successful re-leveling arguments. Read more on my blog about how to use leveling to negotiate the right startup offer or contact me for information on my services.
Pay Gap for Startup Equity. I was recently interviewed by Bloomberg for an article on the gender pay gap for startup equity. They featured a study by Carta which found that women "make up 35 percent of equity-holding employees, but hold only 20 percent of the employee equity," and, further, that women make up "13 percent of founders but hold 6 percent of founder equity." I noted that one reason for the gap may be a lack of willingness to push for information necessary to evaluate a startup equity offer: "Equity is information asymmetry squared. You have to have the confidence to put the responsibility on the company to give you enough information."
Closing the Information Gap. It's up to individuals to educate themselves on equity and negotiate for the right number of shares to balance the risk of joining a startup. The purpose of my practice is to be available to those who need guidance in this process. See my website for more information.
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. - Legal Services for Individuals. Thank you for your enthusiasm for my practice and for the Stock Option Counsel Blog! I will continue to send quarterly updates on important topics in the market for startup equity for individual founders, executives and employees. Please keep in touch.
Best,
Mary
Mary Russell | Attorney and Founder
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. | Legal Services for Individuals
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
New Blog on Change of Control Terms - New Videos - Summer 2018 Newsletter - Stock Option Counsel, P.C
New video for individuals negotiating startup equity offers explaining the difference between startup valuation and 409A valuation.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.Hello Startup Community!
Here's the latest on startup equity for individual founders, executives and employees.
Negotiating Change of Control Protections for Unvested Shares. See my newest post on the four categories of change of control terms, from the worst of the worst - cancellation plans - to the best of the best - single trigger acceleration. It also provides current market info on which terms executives, employees and founders can reasonably expect to negotiate in their offers.
Liquidation Preferences Make the News. FanDuel's $465 million acquisition deal reported by Legal Sports Report shows the power of liquidation preferences. Ordinary shares will receive $0 in the deal because of preferred shares' $543 million liquidation preference. See this post for more info on liquidation preferences and this post on how startup executives consider these in negotiating their offers.
New Videos! Check out new videos on:
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. - Legal Services for Individuals. Thank you for your enthusiasm for my practice and for the Stock Option Counsel Blog! I will continue to send quarterly updates on important topics in the market for startup equity for individual founders, executives and employees. Please keep in touch.
Best,
Mary
Mary Russell | Attorney and Founder
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. | Legal Services for Individuals
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
VIDEO: Founder Restricted Stock Purchase Agreements
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Are you a founder with a restricted stock purchase agreement (RSPA)? Protect your equity stake with change of control vesting acceleration, Section 83(b) election and fine print details.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
VIDEO Startup Stock Options: Exercise Price Basics
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Tax Changes for Startup Executives and Employees - Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 - Q1 2018 Newsletter - Stock Option Counsel, P.C.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Here's our Q1 2018 Newsletter. Sign up for our mailing list to receive these quarterly updates!
Hello Startup Community!
The final Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 is already affecting startup equity holders. Check out my recent blog posts on Tax-Deferred Option Exercises Under the New Section 83(i) and Incentive Stock Options & Changes to the Alternative Minimum Tax. Here's the short version.
Tax Deferral for Option Exercise - New Section 83(i) Election. The new Section 83(i) was designed to defer taxation from a stock option exercise until the shares become liquid. Unfortunately, the details of the new Section 83(i) make it unlikely to work for most startup option holders. But where it does apply it will defer taxation for up to five years from the date of option exercise with the use of the new Section 83(i) Election. These are the key details of the new Section 83(i).
Tax Relief for ISO Exercise - New AMT Limits. Dramatic increases to the exemption amounts and phase out thresholds of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) will allow many more startup employees to exercise Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) tax-free. This allows for more planning opportunities to take advantage of the potential ISO tax benefits of capital gains tax rates on all gains. These are the key details of the AMT changes as they relate to ISO exercise.
Startup Offer Negotiation Tips. What does this mean for our clients negotiating new stock option offers? First, the new Section 83(i) will not provide wide relief from pre-liquidity tax burdens for stock option exercise. So it still makes sense to negotiate for a tax-deferred structure such as early exercise or an extended post-termination exercise period. Second, since the revised AMT limits make the ISO benefits even more appealing than ever, ISOs are far more appealing than NSOs for most people (unless the options will be early exercised.)
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. - Legal Services for Individuals. Thank you for your enthusiasm for my practice and for the Stock Option Counsel Blog! I will continue to send quarterly updates on important topics in the market for startup equity for individual founders, executives and employees. Please keep in touch.
Best,
Mary
Mary Russell | Attorney and Founder
Stock Option Counsel, P.C. | Legal Services for Individuals
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
Tax-Deferred Option Exercises Under The New Section 83(i) - Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
Update December 2024: I still have not seen anyone take advantage of Section 83(i). Sigh. It’s just not drafted in a way that can be helpful. Mostly I just see people confusing it with 83(b).
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.
The final Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 added a new Section 83(i) to the Code intending to allow holders of RSUs and options to defer tax on those benefits until they are able to sell the shares to cover their tax bills. Its drafting makes it unlikely to apply in practice at most startups, but where it applies it can defer taxation for up to five years from the date of option exercise or RSU vesting.
Many issues related to the Section 83(i) Election are unclear from the legislation and will need to be clarified by IRS guidance. So this is the best of my understanding as of today. This is not tax advice for readers, so please consult with your own accountant or CPA.
Update December 2024: I still have not seen anyone take advantage of Section 83(i). Sigh. It’s just not drafted in a way that can be helpful. Mostly I just see people confusing it with 83(b).
Option Exercises & Section 83(i) Election
Because well-designed startup RSUs are already structured to defer taxation until liquidity, the benefits of tax deferral under Section 83(i) are most needed for option exercises.
For eligible option exercises, a timely election under Section 83(i) will defer income at exercise until the earlier of the (i) IPO; (ii) the first date the stock becomes transferable (including to the employer), (iii) five years from exercise, (iv) the first date the employee becomes an “excluded employee,” or (v) the date the election is revoked. The 83(i) Election must be made within a 30-day period after exercise.
These are some of the eligibility requirements:
1. The company must have offered stock options on terms that provide the same rights and privileges (other than the number of shares) in the calendar year of grant to at least 80% of its U.S. employees. Since most startups do not make annual grants of stock options, this would be unlikely to apply except in years of very high growth in staff size, or to the occasional startup that gives broad-based annual refresh grants.
2. The individual must not be a significant owner or executive of the company. The ownership test is met by 1% ownership. The executive test relates to role, such as CEO and CFO, as well as total compensation, as it applies to the four most highly compensated officers of the company. Both definitions have historical applicability, such as a 10-year look back, as well as future applicability, so that if one of the definitions is met after the Section 83(i) Election, the individual becomes an “excluded employee” and the tax deferral ends.
Section 83(i) Notice
Companies are required to provide a Section 83(i) Notice to eligible employees at the time (or a reasonable period before) they become eligible to make the Section 83(i) Election. However, not all eligible employees will be aware of their eligibility, as some companies may still be in the process of assessing eligibility. Therefore, those considering option exercises at private companies may want to inquire as follows:
I understand that the new tax bill created a Section 83(i) Election to allow deferral of taxation at option exercise until the earlier of 5 years from exercise or liquidity. But there are certain rules that have to be met for an option to be eligible, including related to the company’s option grant practices, my own ownership percentage and other requirements. Can you please confirm whether, if I exercise this option, I will be eligible to make a Section 83(i) Election on the stock I purchase?
Making the Section 83(i) Election Decision
Individuals who are eligible to make the Section 83(i) Election will want to consider the pros and cons based on the tax consequences and their investment plans. For example, exercising options and filing the Section 83(i) Election will not solve the pre-liquidity taxation problem if there is not a liquidity event before the five-year (or earlier) deadline. And the Section 83(i) Election converts ISOs into NQSO, so any favorable tax treatment associated with ISOs would be lost. Since the alternative minimum tax exemptions have increased so dramatically, ISOs are more likely to be AMT-free at exercise. Such an ISO exercise may ultimately result in more favorable tax treatment than the Section 83(i) Election, if the shares are held for the full ISO holding periods. And, as in any option exercise, paying the exercise price itself is an investment risk and having a tax-deferred exercise does not make the exercise risk-free.
Negotiating New Offers
All well-negotiated startup equity offers include planning for investment timing, tax timing and tax rates. While the Section 83(i) Election is a new tool in that toolbox, it is not likely to be the most advantageous planning method for new grants. See this post for some examples of my favorite structures for equity offer negotiations.
Attorney Mary Russell counsels individuals on startup equity, including:
You are welcome to contact her at (650) 326-3412 or at info@stockoptioncounsel.com.